<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Spitball Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/</link>
      <description>...it&apos;s what sticks to the chalkboard that counts.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:22:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>MSNBC Breaking News!</title>
         <description>Hilarious ACTUAL titles of emails I received.  These are riddled with Phish and Scams galore, but as time has proven again and again...Spam email titles are sometimes better than the porn they offer...


BREAKING NEWS:  Bush To Rename The Patriot Act!
BREAKING NEWS:  British Penny Actually Worth More Than One Dollar!
BREAKING NEWS:  Senator John McCain Wishes To Have Sex With Model Heidi Klum, Others!
BREAKING NEWS:  Paris Hilton Initially Denies Having Inverted Nipples!
BREAKING NEWS:  Aliens Abducted By Michael Jackson!
BREAKING NEWS:  The Meat Wars: Jessica Simpsons Shirt Tees-off Pam Anderson!
BREAKING NEWS:  The Incredible Hulk: George Bush!
BREAKING NEWS:  Shocking Video Shows Spongebob And Gay Sex!
BREAKING NEWS:  Home Office to Deport Anyone With IQ Below 100!
BREAKING NEWS:  Donald Trump Missing: Feared Kidnapped!
BREAKING NEWS:  [audio] Church Group Offers Homosexual New Life In Closet!
BREAKING NEWS:  Russia, Forget About Georgia&apos;s Old Borders!
BREAKING NEWS:  Oprah Found Sleeping In The Streets!
BREAKING NEWS:  Italy Knocked Out Of Euro 2008!</description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/msnbc_breaking_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/msnbc_breaking_news.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:22:11 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Approval Ratings</title>
         <description><![CDATA[An interesting independently-made anti-McCain commercial:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBfngOsvmA0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBfngOsvmA0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I think it would be a very effective ad, if professionally produced and it's not like it's untrue, but should Obama put some money into this type of advertising? Has he already?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/approval_ratings.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/approval_ratings.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Bush</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Democrats</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">McCain</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Valid Comparison?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LfKXVDbvkoQ&rel=0&fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LfKXVDbvkoQ&rel=0&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

ht to <a href="http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/reagan-in-1980-v-obama-in-2008/">roadkillrefugee</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/valid_comparison.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/08/valid_comparison.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Winning the XKCD Way</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/29/the-3000-final_01.jpg.png"><img alt="the-3000-final_01.jpg.png" src="http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/29/the-3000-final_01.jpg-thumb.png" width="400" height="195" /></a>

<a title="Running for Office: It's Like A Flamewar with a Forum Troll, but with an Eventual Winner" href="http://seantevis.com/kansas/3000/running-for-office-xkcd-style/">This is too awesome!</a> Sean Tevis, an Information Architect in Kansas, decided to run for his state Representative's office.  Problem?  He needed money, at least $26,000.  The comic spells out what happened.  He reached his goal in <strong>24 hours</strong>.

<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-candidate28-2008jul28,0,4489963.story?page=2">According to the LA Times</a>:

<blockquote>As of Saturday, 5,703 people had made online donations to Tevis' campaign. The majority live outside of the state. Fans from other countries even sent more than $1,700 -- which Tevis refunded, in compliance with federal election rules.

Staffers for two political candidates in Kansas and eight out-of-state campaigns -- Democrats and independents running for state or congressional seats -- have contacted Tevis in recent days to ask for help and advice. And the money has continued to pour into Tevis' campaign, along with fan e-mails cheering on his campaign platform of boosting teacher pay, eliminating food taxes and protecting an individual's right to privacy.</blockquote>

Whether or not he wins I applaud him for his wit.  This and Obama'a use of the net for fund raising tell me that politicians are finally figuring out this interwebs thing.  Now is that good?  Well I guess we'll see. 

If you don't read XKCD and you're a geek of ANY strip, <a href="http://xkcd.com/">you should remedy that</a>.

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/winning_the_xkcd_way.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/winning_the_xkcd_way.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:18:42 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Jon Stewart</title>
         <description><![CDATA[on Obama's speech in Berlin. I about died laughing when the apple sauce came crashing down.

<embed FlashVars='videoId=177449' src='http://www.thedailyshow.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#cccccc' width='332' height='316' name='comedy_central_player' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/jon_stewart.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/jon_stewart.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:27:26 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>We have got to elect this man.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I just got finished watching Barack Obama's speech from Berlin. It goes without saying -- in present company, at least -- that it was an outstanding speech. Not so much a policy speech, but symbolically very powerful.

On my way into work today, I heard one commentator on <a href="http://www.xmradio.com/onxm/channelpage.xmc?ch=130">POTUS 08</a> talking about how it might be seen as a bad thing that Obama attracted more people (approximately 100,000, based on estimates I've seen) to a foreign event than he has in any national event. I can see a couple problems with that analysis: First, he is only in the city for one day. I know people from all over Germany (and probably elsewhere in Europe) came to see him speak. If he was doing events everyday in Europe, obviously it wouldn't be so massive. Secondly, I'm not sure how a show of international support could be considered a negative. Is America really that xenophobic that foreign support would hurt Obama? (Stupid question; we tend to elect someone based on whether or not we could drink a beer with them.) Obama enjoys international support because he doesn't have a "with us or against us" mentality. He has a more nuanced and intelligent approach to foreign policy. <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/23/obamas_tour_the_secret_to_the/">He knows what he's talking about!</a> Once again, it astounds me that this is a negative thing for some.

What I found striking as the camera panned over the huge crowd were the American flags some were waving. It is so refreshing to see Berliners actually willing and proud to wave our flag. That, in itself was more moving to me than the actual speech. If we want to improve the America's image for the rest of the world, we have to elect Obama.

Watch the speech after the break.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/we_have_got_to_elect_this_man.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/we_have_got_to_elect_this_man.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ideology</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:27:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>For Posterity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sen. Elizabeth Dole, a Salisbury Republican, introduced an amendment to add Helms, who died July 4, to the title of a $50 billion bill considered Wednesday in the Senate. Her measure never came up for a vote.

Helms, a deeply conservative Republican from Raleigh, was the frequent nemesis of gay activists. "There is not one single case of AIDS in this country that cannot be traced in origin to sodomy," he once said.</blockquote>
<a title="newsobserver.com | Dole fails to name AIDS bill for Helms" href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1144220.html">News and Observer</a> 

<em><strong>* edit Incidentally and thanks to Sid, the bill was for global AIDS relief. </strong></em>

Now I get naming stuff after dead politicians, even recently dead politicians and especially recently dead unpopular politicians.  Legacy is important to some.  If you're going to do it though, shouldn't you pick something that makes sense?  

While it's true that the quote comes from the 80's (which doesn't excuse it's ignorance) and that Senator Helms worked later in life to soften his opinion, this just leaves me scratching my head.  Does it make sense to anyone else?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/for_posterity.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/for_posterity.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:57:44 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;Idiot&apos;s Veto&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Roger Simon at Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11798.html">weighs in on <em>The New Yorker's</em> recent cover</a>:  <blockquote>... [T]his is what is called the Idiot’s Veto: If a single person might not get a joke, then you should not tell the joke. All humor (and everything else) should be reduced to the lowest common denominator just to make sure nobody misunderstands anything.

This would, of course, remove a lot of the humor from life. Shows like “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart” and “The Colbert Report,” both of which are almost pure satire, would have to go off the air. And the late-night comics would have to shut up. And many writers would have to stop writing. All in order to have an idiot-proof society.</blockquote> While I get the satire, and personally though the cartoon was funny, I understand where Obama is coming from when he says that it could reinforce the rumors the cartoon is trying satirize. I would go a step further (a step that Obama cannot take) and say that those who are overreacting are the uneducated and ignorant -- hardly <em>The New Yorker's</em> primary audience.

What say you? Is the cover offensive? Good satire? Bad satire?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/idiots_veto.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/idiots_veto.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:07:51 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>JibJab</title>
         <description>You know it&apos;s not really an election year until JibJab makes a cartoon about it!

Click through to view.</description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/jibjab.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/jibjab.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:44:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bush surveys the damage</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_aEURwsrUSQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_aEURwsrUSQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/bush_surveys_the_damage.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/bush_surveys_the_damage.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Bush</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Crime</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:48:57 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Centricity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Today is my day for making up words.  Deal with it!

So <a href="http://www.sidfaiwu.com/blog/index.php/2008/07/barack-obama-front-and-center/">Sid</a> makes a point that Obama is making that move to the center that seems fairly common this time of year as the candidates start to scramble for those people in or near the middle.  My comment to him was that compromise is necessary to the democratic process.  You need to be able to give and take.

In this day and age that seems to be a novel concept.  Maybe it has always been so.  In any event I think that one can and should go towards the center on a concept like abortion.  Polarizaton solves nothing.  You end up with a stalemate.  I am actually anti-abortion from a strictly moral place, but in terms of my politics I have been labeled pro-choice (or anti-life depending upon your POV).  I think that it is VITAL to be able to cross the aisle on hard topics.  Compromise is not a dirty word.  It is hard work and I think you do need to have lines you won't cross, but some give and take should be expected.  What say you?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/centricity.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/centricity.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ideology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:36:51 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Happy Fourth of July!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[By this time, most of you are at BBQs, eating burgers, drinking beer, blowing hands off, etc. If you're not, you're supporting the terrorists. (Don't worry; I'm getting ready to go do all that.)

But, at the risk of making this a "remember the reason for the season" post, I'd urge you to think a little about what we're celebrating: our declaration of independence from England. Read the text of the entire Declaration of Independence after the jump. It's always a good read -- as is anything written by Thomas Jefferson -- especially if you haven't read it in a while.

Said John Adams about the second of July (the day we actually declared independence): <blockquote>The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more.</blockquote>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/happy_fourth_of_july.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/07/happy_fourth_of_july.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ideology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:35:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Novak: Powell an Obama supporter?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This might be the only time you see me quote from a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/25/AR2008062501942.html">Robert Novak article</a>, but here goes... <blockquote>His tenuous 13-year relationship with the Republican Party, following his retirement from the Army, has ended. The national security adviser for Ronald Reagan left the present administration bitter about being ushered out of the State Department a year earlier than he wanted. As an African American, friends say, Powell is sensitive to racial attacks on Obama and especially on Obama's wife, Michelle. While McCain strategists shrug off defections from Bruce Bartlett and Larry Hunter, they wince in anticipating headlines generated by Powell's expected endorsement of Obama. </blockquote> As <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/06/26/powell-for-obama.aspx">Jason, over at the Plank said</a>: "I'll see your Liebermann and raise you a Powell." How cool would that be?!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/novak_powell_an_obama_supporte.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/novak_powell_an_obama_supporte.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Conservatism</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ideology</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Republicans</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:47:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Who says money can&apos;t buy happiness?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[It can apparently <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0608/Dems_who_flipped_on_FISA_immunity_see_more_telecom_cash.html">buy 94 Democrats in the House</a>.

From <a href="http://www.maplight.org/FISA_June08" rel="external">MAPLight.org</a>:
<blockquote>Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint gave PAC contributions averaging:

$8,359 to each Democrat who changed their position to support immunity for Telcos (94 Dems)
$4,987 to each Democrat who remained opposed to immunity for Telcos (116 Dems)

88 percent of the Dems who changed to supporting immunity (83 Dems of the 94) received PAC contributions from Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint during the last three years (Jan. 2005-Mar. 2008). See below for list of these 94 Dems.
...
"Campaign contributions bias our legislative system,” said Daniel Newman, Executive Director of MAPLight.org. “Simply put, candidates who take positions contrary to industry interests are unlikely to receive industry funds and thus have fewer resources for their election campaigns than those whose votes favor industry interests."</blockquote>

This is absolutely sickening news.  Selling out your constituents is one thing.  Selling out your freedom is blatantly criminal.  I hope this gets picked up in the mainstream.

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/who_says_money_cant_buy_happin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/who_says_money_cant_buy_happin.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Corruption</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Democrats</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:03:58 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;Country I Love&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Obama's first general election ad:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ylVTBiGh00c&hl=en&rel=0"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ylVTBiGh00c&hl=en&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/country_i_love.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spitballpolitics.com/2008/06/country_i_love.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:47:27 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
